اولویت بندی روستاهای هدف بوم گردی روستایی در منطقه جنگلی حوزه آبخیز بابلکرود

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جنگلداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران.

2 استاد گروه جنگلداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه جنگلداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

4 دکتری جنگلداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

چکیده

بوم‌گردی روستایی بر اساس اصول و معیارها علمی از رویکردهای ضروری در فرآیند نیل به توسعه پایدار و جلوگیری از هدررفت وقت و سرمایه است. روش تحقیق این پژوهش توصیفی- تحلیلی و هدف آن اولویت‌بندی روستاهای هدف بوم‌گردی روستایی در منطقه جنگلی حوزه‌آبخیز بابلکرود از توابع استان مازندران است. در این تحقیق، از روش دلفی به منظور شناسایی معیارهای بوم‌گردی روستایی، تکنیک Entropy برای تعیین وزن‌ آنها و از مدل‌های تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره TOPSIS، ElECTER و VIKOR برای اولویت‌بندی روستاهای منطقه جنگلی حوزه‌آبخیز بابلکرود از نظر توان بوم‌گردی روستایی در سال 1399 استفاده شد. یافته‌های این تحقیق، چهار معیار زیست‌محیطی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فنی و 44 شاخص را جهت ارزیابی بوم-گردی روستایی شناسایی و در منطقه مورد مطالعه بومی‌سازی نمود. نتایج اولویت‌بندی 17 روستای منطقه جنگلی حوزه‌آبخیز بابلکرود نشان داد به ترتیب روستاهای خلیل‌کلا، خرکاک، آری، کالیکلا و فیروزجاه با کسب بیشترین میانگین نهایی جزء پنج روستای با توان بالا جهت بوم‌گردی روستایی هستند. همچنین نتایج نشان می‌دهد به کارگیری مدل‌های گوناگون چندمعیاره به رتبه‌بندی متفاوتی از گزینه‌های رقیب منجر می‌شود، بنابراین جهت حصول به اجماع و نیز رتبه‌بندی جامع‌تر گزینه‌ها، روش ادغام سه‌گانه استفاده شده است. نتایج این روش نشان داد مدل ویکور در قیاس با سایر مدل‌ها نتایج مناسبتری برای اولویت‌بندی روستاهای منطقه از نظر توان بوم‌گردی روستایی ارائه می‌دهد. لذا، پیشنهاد می‌شود روستاهای هدف بومگردی در این مطالعه در برنامه‌های مدیریتی و اجرای پروژه‌های بوم‌گردی روستایی در استان مازندران، شهرستان سوادکوه بیشتر مد نظر قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prioritization of Rural Ecotourism Target Villages in the Forest Area of Babolakrood Watershed

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hassan Jalili Asle 1
  • Asghar Fallah 2
  • Jafar Oladi 3
  • Sareh Hosseini 4
1 MSc Student of Forestry, Natural Resources Faculty, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari. Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Forestry, Natural Resources Faculty, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Forestry, Natural Resources Faculty, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.
4 PhD Forestry, Natural Resources Faculty, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University. Sari, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Rural ecotourism based on scientific principles and criteria is one of the essential approaches in the process of achieving sustainable development and preventing the waste of time and capital.The research method is descriptive-analytical and its purpose is to prioritize the villages targeted for rural ecotourism in the forest area of Babolakrood watershed in Mazandaran province. In the study, Delphi method to identify rural ecotourism criteria, Entropy technique to determine their weight and multi-criteria decision models such as TOPSIS, ElECTER and VIKOR to prioritize villages in the forest area of Babolakrood watershed in terms of ecotourism potential rural in 2019. The findings of the study identified and customized four environmental, economic, social and technical criteria and 44 indicators to evaluate rural ecotourism in case stuady. The results of prioritization of 17 villages in the forest region of Babolakrood watershed showed that Khalil Kola, Kharkak, Ari, Kalikola and Firozjah villages respectively are five villages with high potential for rural ecotourism, with the highest final average. Also, the results showed that the application of different multi-criteria models leads to different ranking of options, so in order to reach a consensus and a more comprehensive ranking of options, the triple integration method has been used. The results showed that VIKOR model in comparison with other models provides more suitable results for prioritizing the villages of the region in terms of rural ecotourism potential. Therefore, we suggested that the target ecotourism villages considered in the management programs of rural ecotourism projects in Mazandaran province,Savadkuh city.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rural ecotourism
  • TOPSIS
  • VIKOR
  • ElECTER
  • Babolacrood

مراجع

  • Akrivos, C., Reklitis, P. and Theodoroyiani, M. (2014). Tourism entrepreneurship and the adoption of sustainable resources (the case of Evritania prefecture). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148: 378-382.
  • Abu Nouri, A. and Akbari, Z. (2014). Classification of factors affecting economic indicators of tourism outside the case study: selected countries. Geography and Development, 12 (34): 33-56. (Persian)
  • Asghariyan,, Rostami, S.T., Nasirahmadi, K. and Oladi. J. (2012). Identification of criteria and indicators of nature management in forest parks in northern Iran using the Delphi method. Iranian Journal of Natural Ecosystems, 2(4): 93-103. (Persian)
  • Ashok, S., Tewari, H., Behera, M. and Majumdar, A. (2017). Development of ecotourism sustainability assessment framework employing Delphi, C&I and participatory methods: A case study of KBR, west Sikkim, India. Tourism Management Perspectives, 21: 24-41.
  • Asgharpour, M. (2004). Multi-criteria decision making and operations research theory. Tehran: University of Tehran press. (Persian)
  • Bahraini, H. and Jahani Moghaddam, H. (2004). Utilizing the potential of the regions for the evelopment of tourism in Suleiman Mosque oil Museum park. Ecology, 35: 33-52. (Persian)
  • Barkauskiene, K. and Snieska, V. (2013). Ecotourism as an integral part of sustainable tourism development. Economics & Management, 18(3): 449-456.
  • Bonye, S.Z., Yiridomoh, G.Y. and Dayour, F. (2022). Do ecotourism sites enhance rural development in Ghana? evidence from the Wechiau community Hippo Sanctuary project in the upper west region, Wa, Ghana. Journal of Ecotourism, 21(2): 121-146.
  • Choi, H.C. and Sirakaya, E. (2006). Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism. Tourism management, 27(6): 1274-1289.
  • Einali, J., Romani, A. and Ismaili, A. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing tourist attractions for regional development using TOPSIS and VICOR models (Case study: Kurdistan province). Quarterly Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 4(2): 195-201. (Persian)
  • Foroozi, M., Danehkar. and Zahedi, A. (2016). Explaining the criteria and indicators of sustainable tourism management sample study: Mangrove forests of Khamir and Qeshm basins. Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 17:169-194. (Persian)
  • Ghodsipour, H. (2002). AHP data analysis process. Tehran: Amir Kabir university of technology publishing (Persian)
  • Hadadnia, S. and Danehkar A. (2012). Prioritization of ecotourism criteria in desert and semi-arid ecosystems by Delphi method. Prioritization of ecotourism criteria in desert and semi-desert ecosystems by Delphi method. Journal of Geography and Urban Planning, 2(3): 17-30. (Persian)
  • Hosseini A., Poorahad A., Oruji, H. and Alizadeh, M. (2014). Priority of measuring cultural tourism development strategies in Alamut region of Qazvin. Human Geography Research, 35(1): 1-17. (Persian)
  • Hosseini, S., Amirnejad, H. and Oladi, J. (2017). The valuation of functions and services of forest ecosystem of Kiasar national park. Agricultural Economics, 11(1): 211-239.
  • Jafari samimi, and Khebreh, S. (2014). Tourism impact on human development. Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 2(7): 11-24. (Persian)
  • Jiang, J. (2008). Evaluation of the potential of ecotourism to contribute to local sustainable development: a case study of Tengtou village, China: a thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of philosophy in development studies at Massey university, New Zealand Massey university].
  • Khaliji, M., Sarvar, R. and Zarabadi, Z. S.S. (2018). Analysis on the types of fragmentations and their effectiveness on the integrated fulfillment management of thecapital suburb. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 13(2): 283-303.
  • Lafor Forestry Plan. (2014). Environmental sustainability and resources consulting engineers, (Persian).
  • Mahdinejad, J., Zarghami, I. and Sadat, S.A. (2015). The relationship between human and nature in Iranian Paradise from Islamic architecture viewpoint. Naqshejahan, 5(1):27-41. (Persian).
  • Mahini, R., Mathematics, B., Naimi, B., Babaei Kafaki, S. and Javadi Larijani, A. (2009). Evaluation of nature tourism potential of Behshahr city based on multi-criteria evaluation method using GIS. Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology, 11(1): 187-198. (Persian)
  • Mazdeh, F., Soleimani, K. and Hosseini, S. (2019). Prioritization of criteria for determining the potential of two-series forestry plan for sustainable development of ecotourism using multi-criteria decision-making models Entropy and TOPSIS. Tourism Research Quarterly, 1(3): 18-34. (Persian)
  • Momeni, M., Sarrafi, M. and Ghasemi-Khozani, M. (2008). The structure and function of religious-cultural tourism and the necessity of integrated management in Mashhad metropolis. Geography and development, 6(11):13-38. (Persian)
  • Manca, D.P., Varnhagen, S., Brett-McLean, P., Allan G.M, Szafran, O. and Ausford, A. (2007). Rewards and challenges of family practice: web- based survey using the Delphi method. Can FAM physician, 53(2): 277-286.
  • Nematollahi, Z., Mojavarian, M. and Hosseinzadeh, M. (2016). Prioritization of tourism target villages in Mazandaran Agricultural Development and Economics Map, 30(3): 218-226. (Persian)
  • Nouri, Gh. and Tabatabaian, S. (2006). Sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision making issues compared to the method used. University of Tehran, 36(15): 25-38. (Persian)
  • Poorahmad A., Shahbazi A. and Khaliji, M. (2016). Using multi-criteria decision making models in assessing tourism capabilities (Case study of semnan province). Geographical Studies of Arid, 21: 50-66. (Persian)
  • Rahimi, D. and Ranjbar Dastnani, M. (2013). Evaluation and prioritization of ecotourism attractions in tourism target villages, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Urban and Regional Studies and Research, 4(14): 131-150. (Persian)
  • Skulmoski, G.J., Hartman, F.T. and Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1): 1-21.
  • Tsaur, S.H., Lin, Y.C. and Lin, J.H. (2006). Evaluating ecotourism sustainability from the integrated perspective of resource, community and tourism. Tourism management, 27(4): 640-653.
  • Tavakoli, N., Sharifi, M. and Akram, A. (2018). Performance evaluation of the most common multi-index decision making techniques in ranking the effective parameters in the Agility of the cooperative distribution chain of Fars province, Biosystems Engineering of Iran, 48(3): 299-308. (Persian)
  • Xiaoli, C. (2021). Evaluation of rural ecotourism resources based on the AHP method in Shanghai. IOP conference series: Earth and Environmental Science.
  • Yianna, F. and Poulicos, P. (2000). Sustainable development indicators: an overview. Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematic, Regional Analysis Devedunal.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار