سنجش سطح توسعه یافتگی دهستان‌‌های استان لرستان با استفاده از روش ویکور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، واحد ایلام، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلام، ایران

2 استاد ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، ,واحد ایلام، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلام، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران.

4 استادیار ترویج وآموزش کشاورزی، واحد ایلام، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلام، ایران

چکیده

توسعه صرفاً پدیده ­ای اقتصادی نیست و بسیاری از جوامع به­ منظور تقویت پایه­ های توسعه و رفع و تعدیل عدم تعادل­ ها و انبوه مسائل و مشکلات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی خود، نیازمند برنامه­ ریزی و شناسایی امکانات و منابع بالفعل و بالقوه­ شان هستند. پژوهش حاضر به ­منظور تعیین درجه توسعه­ یافتگی دهستان‌های استان لرستان و رتبه ­بندی آن­ها بر اساس میزان توسعه­ یافتگی با استفاده از روش آنالیز ویکور و تاپسیس انجام شده ­است. در این پژوهش با استفاده از آخرین آمار و اطلاعات مربوط به سال 1395 و بر اساس ادبیات موجود، صد و ده متغیر در قالب هشت شاخص (آموزشی، جمعیتی، زیربنایی، اقتصادی، بهداشت و درمان، خدماتی، فرهنگی، رفاهی و عملکردی ­کشاورزی) مورد بررسی و مطالعه قرار گرفته است. نتایج حاکی از آن است که توزیع امکانات و خدمات بین دهستان­های این استان به ­صورت ناهمگن صورت گرفته است؛ به­ طوری­ که دهستان ­شیروان، رتبه اول را دارا بوده و عنوان منطقه توسعه ­یافته را کسب کرده است. دهستان ­های بازوند و گودرزی نیز رتبه های دوم و سوم را دارند که جزء مناطق در حال توسعه محسوب ­می ‏شوند و دیگر دهستان­ها جزء مناطق نسبتاً محروم و محروم هستند. همچنین دهستان­ های گل‌گل، کرگاه­ غربی، رومیانی، ژان، شیروان، ازنا، چالانچولان و چم‌سنگر به ترتیب در شاخص ­های آموزشی، جمعیتی، زیربنایی، اقتصادی، بهداشت و درمان، خدماتی، فرهنگی، رفاهی، عملکردی­ کشاورزی رتبه های اول را دارا بودند. استناد به یافته ­های این پژوهش می تواند به منظور بهبود مدیریت و سیاست‌گذاری توسعه دهستان‏ های مورد مطالعه در راستای دستیابی به توسعه پایدار توسط سیاست­ گذاران، برنامه­ ریزان و مدیران ذی­ ربط مورد بهره­ برداری قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessing the Level of Development in Rural Districts of Lorestan Province Using the VIKOR Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Hasanvandiyan 1
  • A.R. Poursaeed 2
  • roya eshraghi samani 3
  • H. Chaharsoughi Amin 4
1 PhD Student in Agricultural Extension and Education, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The village is the oldest form of human settlements and rural living is one of the oldest ways of social life. Paying attention to the village and rural dwellers has a high importance and a special place in the world. Rural development has always been one of the main components and elements of national development. Development is not just an economic phenomenon and many societies need to plan and identify their actual and potential facilities and resources in order to strengthen the foundations of development when also they need to correct and adjust the imbalances and multitude of economic, social and cultural issues and problems. The lack of a comprehensive evaluation based on scientific methods of the degree of development and its level of imbalance in different levels of cities and villages is one of the main obstacles in identifying priorities and formulating provincial development plans. For this purpose, paying attention to the approaches of regional balance and regional policy making and planning to reduce existing heterogeneity and inequalities requires studying and recognizing the importance of the characteristics of each region with regard to its position in the entire regional system. The current study is conducted to determine the development rate in rural districts of Lorestan province as well as to rank them using the VIKOR and TOPSIS analysis method.
Material and Methods
Multi-instrument decision-making techniques are suitable for ranking in a set of existing indicators with respect to multi-dimensional and multi-contradictory features. In Iran, the statistical analysis of the provinces has been published by the Iranian Statistics Center, and the selected indicators play an important role in the development of the regions. In this research, like other studies conducted in the field of evaluating the development levels of villages and rural areas, in order to formulate a regular and logical framework of indicators that express the characteristics of rural development in the study area, based on global experiences, the literature on the subject, and the review of available information from referring to the statistical yearbook of villages of Lorestan province, 110 key and effective indicators in the field of rural development were selected for Lorestan province. The selected indicators are classified in eight different educational, demographic, infrastructural, economic, health and treatment, cultural services, welfare and functional agricultural sectors. After identifying and selecting the indicators,  determined the degree of development of the villages of Lorestan province and rank them based on the level of development were carried out. This did using multi-indicator decision-making techniques (VIKOR and TOPSIS), which are among the best statistical models and calculations in the field of measurement and ranking.
Results and Discussion
The results show a heterogeneous distribution of facilities and services among rural districts of this province, with Shirvan as a developed region ranked in the first place. In addition, Bazvand and Goudarzi as the second and third place, are developing regions respectively, while other rural districts are considered deprived and relatively deprived regions. Moreover, GolGol, West Kargah, Roumiani, Zhan, Shirvan, Azna, ChalanChulan, and Chamsangar rural districts are ranked in first place in educational, demographic, infrastructure, economic, health service, cultural, welfare, and agricultural indicators respectively. In other words, based on the results of the present research, it can be stated that the rural areas of Lorestan province have an unbalanced distribution in terms of development indicators. So that Shirvan district has all the development indicators (educational, population, infrastructure, economic, health and treatment, service, cultural, welfare and agricultural performance) at a favorable level and therefore it is considered developed. In the same way, the development indicators in Bazund and Guderzi villages are improving and for this reason they are at the developing level. Meanwhile, a small amount of development indicators have been distributed in Rumiani, Silakhor, West Kargah, Durood, North Mirbeg, West Pachelek, Chalancholan, East Japleq, East Silakhor, Yusufvand, Heshmatabad, Mozafari and Zhan villages. For this reason, they are among relatively deprived villages. In total, based on the findings, 70 sub-districts of Lorestan province also lack development indicators and are evaluated as deprived of development.
Conclusion
Based on current research findings, it can be applied by policy makers, planners and relevant managers to improve rural development management and policy-making in order to achieve sustainable development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Lorestan Province
  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Decision Making
  • Development
  • VIKOR

مراجع

1.        Amanpour, S., Mokhtari Chelcheh, S., Hosseini Kahnoj, R. & Veisi, E. (2015). Spatial analysis and evaluation of rural development (Case study: Counties of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiyari). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 10, 97-110. [In Persian]
2.        Ashrafi, M., Hooshmand, M. & Keramatzadeh, A. (2014). Investigation of agricultural sustainable development in rural areas, with an emphasis on economic approach: A case study of Kashmar villages. Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 1(2), 51-68. [In Persian]
3.         Azizpour, F., Shamsi, R. & Najafi, H. (2012). Economic challenges of rural settlement development in Iran. National Rural Development Conference, Gilan, Iran, 1-8. [In Persian]
4.        Banihabib, M. & Chitsaz, N. (2016). A multi-criteria VIKOR Model for assessment of flood-management options. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 7(1), 68-82. [In Persian]
5.        Bosshagh, M., Taghvaei, M. & Taghdisi, A. (2014). Sustainable agricultural mental indicators analysis in Iran rural regions (Case study: Rural regions of Azna township). Journal of Urban - Regional Studies and Research, 5(20), 89-104. [In Persian]
6.        Chang, Y.H. & Yeh, C.H. (2001). EValuating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making. Omega, 29, 405-415.
7.        Chu, M.T., Shyu, J., Tzeng, G.H. & Khosla, R. (2007). Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities' group-decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 1011-1024.
8.        Das, R. & Das, A.K. (2011). Industrial cluster: An approach for rural development in north east India. International Journal of Trade Economics and Finance, 2(2), 161-165.
9.        Douglas, D.J.A. (2005). The restructuring of local government in rural regions: A rural development perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(2), 231-246.
10.    Eftakhari, E. & Ganjali, J. (2021). Classification of physical development of rural settlements city of Isfahan province using AHP and TOPSIS model. Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 10(39), 27-40. [In Persian]
11.    El-Santawy, M.F. (2012). A VIKOR method for solving personnel training selection problem. International Journal of Computing Science, 1(2), 2164-1374. Available at: http://www.researchpub.org/journal/ijcs/ijcs.html
12.    Esmailzadeh, H. & Esmailzadeh, Y. (2021). Application of multi criteria models in evaluating development level of human habitations (Case study: Counties of Tehran province). Sustainable Development and Geographic Environment, 3(5), 109-125. [In Persian]
13.    Esmailzadeh, H., Salehpour, Sh. & Esmailzadeh, Y. (2015). Spatial analysis of the level of development of rural areas in the cities of East Azerbaijan province in terms of development indicators and its relationship with social capital. Journal of Spatial Planning, 5(16), 53-69. [In Persian]
14.    Fallah Haghighi, N., Bijani, M. & Parhizkar, M. (2018). An analysis of major social obstacles affecting human resource development in Iran. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(3), 372-388.
15.    Ghaderi, N., Shams, A., Ahadnejad Reveshty, M. & Hooshmandan MoghaddamFard, Z. (2016). Measurement and analysis of agricultural development level in rural areas of Paveh city using VIKOR method. Agricultural Economics and Development, 24(1), 81-109. [In Persian]
16.    Ghaderzadeh, H., Bagheri, K. & Aminpoor, D. (2017). Measurement of development level of counties in Kurdistan province using main indicators of agricultural sector. Agricultural Economics and Development, 25(1), 1-23. [In Persian]
17.    Ghadirimasoum, M., Salmani, M., Badri, S.A., Faraji Sabokbar, H.A. & Ghanbari Nasab, A. (2014). Changes of agricultural economy and formation of urban ruralization Case: Villages of Roobat Karim county. Space Economics and Rural Development, 3(9), 63-81. [In Persian]
18.    Ghafari Gilandeh, A., Alavi, S. & Aftab, A. (2018). Measurement of spatial distribution of industrial components intermsof its level of development Case study: city of Ardabi. Geographical Planning of Space, 8(28), 115-132. [In Persian]
19.    Ghazanfarpour, H., Mosazadeh, H. & Khodadad, M. (2021). Assessment and developmental leveling of Hamedan cities based on the indicators of health and treatment using fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) and arc GIS. Quarterly Journal of Geography Environment Preparation, 13(51), 179-202. [In Persian]
20.    Grimm, M., (2008). A human development index by income groups. World Development, 12, 2527–2546.
21.    Jafarzadeh, J., Rostamzadeh, H. & Khoshbakhtan, I. (2017). Ranking the developing of rural districts in Ardabil province based on numerical taxonomy model. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 12(3), 699-710. [In Persian]
22.    Kackar, R.N. (1985). Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method. Journal of Quality Technology, 17(4), 176-188.
23.    Kalantari, Kh., Asadi, A. & Choobchian, Sh. (2009). Development and validation of indicators of sustainable development in rural areas. Regional Urban Studies and Research, 1(2), 86-69. [In Persian]
24.    Karimzadeh, M. & Karimzadeh, B. (2018). Evaluating development level of Sistan and Baluchistan province in terms of accessibility to health care services. Zanko Journal of Medical Sciences, 19(62), 18-30. [In Persian]
25.    Kavianirad, M., Irani Heris, S. & Biniyaz, M. (2021). Assessing the levels of development in Kurdistan province counties and its relationship with human hazard. Quarterly Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas, 1(4), 51-67. [In Persian]
26.    Khademi, H. & Zarepour, F. (2017). Assessing the degree of development of rural areas of Neyriz city by numerical taxonomy method. Human Geography Research, 49(1), 80-69. [In Persian]
27.    Khodapnah, K. & Beik Mohammadi, H. (2009). Evaluation and classification of rural areas in the central part of Ardabil city based on the level of development indicators. Geographical Space, 9(26), 1-30. [In Persian]
28.    Khosravi, S., Lashgarara, F., Poursaeed, A.R. & Omidi Najafabadi, M. (2022). Modeling the relationship between urban agriculture and sustainable development: A case study in Tehran city. Arabian Journal of Geoscience, 15(1), 97. DOI:10.1007/s12517-021-09396-y
29.    Lin, C.L. (2012). Etermine the market position for VTS service systems based on service value. The Fourth International Conferences on Advanced Service Computin, 70-77.
30.    Liou, J.J., Tsai, C.Y., Lin, R.H. & Tzeng, G.H. (2011). A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(2), 57-61.
31.    Mirahmadi, N. & Teimoury, E. (2012). A fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection and evaluation: Case of Emersun Company. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 5(2), 5272-5287.
32.    Mohammadi, H.R., Monshizadeh, R., Rahmani, B. & Pakparvar, M. (2022). Systemic approach in spatial planning of rural development according to the structural-functional approach. Human Geography Research, 54(1): 269-287. [In Persian]
33.    Moradi Masihi, V. & Talebi, M. (2017). Structural analysis of sustainable rural development indicators case: Sumehsara province villages. Space Economics and Rural Development, 6(21), 165-180. [In Persian]
34.    Mosayyebzadeh, A., Mozafari Niya, A. & Shabestar, M. (2021). Analysis of spatial inequalities and assessing of regional development statuse in the provinces of Iran. Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 10(40), 71-84. [In Persian]
35.    Mousavi, M., Akbari, M. & Mohamadi Hamidi, S. (2017). Comparative comparison of Iran's human development indicators with sub-continent countries of India over the past 35 years using the Vikor model. Journal of Subcontinent Researches, 9(33), 213-238. [In Persian]
36.    Mousavi, M., Meshkini, A., Veysian, M. & Hosseini, M. (2017). Assess the levels of development health services with the model multiple criteria decision making (Case study: City of Khorasan Razavi province). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 11(37), 99-112. [In Persian]
37.    Naderi, F., Naseri, B. & Bastami, N. (2021). Efficiency of victor model in landslide risk zoning in the watershed of Galal Dam in Ilam province. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 10(1), 21-39. [In Persian]
38.    Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 445-455.
39.    Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Ph.D thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 302.
40.    Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy ViKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert System with Applications, 38(10), 12983-12990.
41.    Pourjavid, S., Poursaeed, A.R. & Mirdamadi, S.M (2020). Modeling the effectiveness of urban agriculture education courses. Urban Ecosystems, 23(1).  DOI:10.1007/s11252-020-00955-x
42.    Prato, T. & Herath, G. (2007). Multiple-criteria decision analysis for integrated catchment management. Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), 627–632.
43.    Raadabadi, M., Baroni, M., Goodarzi, G., Baqian, N. & Saber Mahani, A. (2016). Evaluation of development levels of cities in kerman province in terms of health indicators using numerical taxonomy model. Journal of Health Research, 4(3), 212-202. [In Persian]
44.    Rahimi, M., Kakadezfoli, A. & Kakadezfoli, A. (2016). Evaluation of the provinces in terms of educational development using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 5(10), 12-29. [In Persian]
45.    Rastegari, H. & Nooripoor, M. (2019). Assessing the development level of rural areas of central district of Falavarjan province: The application of artificial Neural network. Geographical Quarterly Journal of Environmental Management, 12(44), 179-200. [In Persian]
46.    Sabzali Parikhani, R., Sadighi, H. & Bijani, M. (2018). Ecological consequences of nanotechnology in agriculture: Researchers’ perspective. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 20(2), 205-219.
47.    Sadeghi, Z., Rezaee Jafari, M. & Ghasemi Nejad, A. (2020). Investigating the pollution of renewable power plants with AHP, TOPSIS and VIKOR analysis approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(8), 43-58. [In Persian]
48.    Salmani, A., Poursaeed, A.R., Bayramzadeh, V. &EshraghiSamani, R. (2021). Social network analysis of sustainable forest management actors in Zagros region. Arabian Journal of Geoscience, 14(2701). DOI: 10.1007/s12517-021-09032-9
49.    Shahrokhi Sardo, S., Mahmoodiberam, M., Moolai, A. & Agha Abasi, N. (2016). Evaluating the development levels of rural areas in Koohrang county. Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 2(4), 400-383. [In Persian]
50.    Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.
51.    Sharifikia, M., Shayan, S., Yamani, M. & Arab Ameri, A. (2018). Morphometric parameter extraction and analysis for watershed periodization over the Naka Roud catchment. Iranian journal of Ecohydrology, 5(1), 69-83. [In Persian]
52.    Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M. & Tarokh, M.J. (2011). A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12160-12167.‏
53.    Stevenson, W.J. (2005). Operations Management. eighth ED, New York: McGraw-Hill.
54.    Valizadeh, N., Esfandiyari Bayat, S., Bijani, M., Hayati, D., Viira, A.H., Tanaskovik. V., Kurban, A. & Azadi, H. (2021). Understanding farmers’ intention towards the management and conservation of wetlands. Land, 10(8), 860.
55.    Wang, C.H. & Pang, C.T. (2011). Using VIKOR method for evaluating service quality of online auction under fuzzy environment. Journal of Economics Computer Science, 1(1), 307-314.
56.    Wang, X.D., Zhong, X.H., Liu, S.Z., Wang, Z.Y. & Li, M.H. (2008). Regional assessment of environmental vulnerability in the Tibetan plateau: Development and application of a new method. Journal of Arid Environment, 72(10), 1929-1939.
57.    Weisi Nab, F., Babaei Aghdam, F., Alipour, Kh. & Need, ch. (2016). Evaluation and ranking of the level of educational development of the provinces of Zagros region using the Vickor multi-criteria model. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 5(9), 11-29. [In Persian]
58.    Yazdani, M.H., Seyedeyn, A. & Tayefe Eisa Khajeloo, R. (2015). Evaluation and analysis of the level of infrastructure development in rural areas of Ardabil province. Space Economics and Rural Development, 4(13), 39-56. [In Persian]
59.    Yildirim, B.F. & Kuzu Yıldırım, S. (2022). Evaluating the satisfaction level of citizens in municipality services by using picture fuzzy VIKOR method: 2014-2019 period analysis. Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(1), 50-66.
60.    Zahedi, M., Ghaffari, G. & Ebrahimilouye, A. (2013). Theoretical deficiencies of rural development in Iran. Journal of Rural Research, 3(12), 7-30. [In Persian]
61.    Zarei, Y. (2017a). Assessment of some indicators of social development in rural areas (Case study: Hormozgan province). Welfare and Social Development Planning, 28, 229-193. [In Persian]
62.    Zarei, Y. (2017b). Measuring development in rural areas with emphasis on some socio-cultural indicators studied: Cities of Khorasan Razavi province. Khorasan Socio-Cultural Studies, 11(2), 51-75. [In Persian]

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار